Project Title 8 |
Provision of External Evaluation Services of ENHANCER Project |
||||
Name of legal entity |
Country |
Name of client |
Origin of funding |
Dates (Start-end) |
Name of consortium members, if any |
BYS Grup |
Türkiye |
International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD) |
EU |
December 14, 2023 – ONGOING |
BYS Grup |
Detailed description of project |
Type and scope of services provided |
||||
The ENHANCER project aims to equip Syrians under Temporary Protection (SuTPs) and local host communities LHCs with entrepreneurship skills and provide them with opportunities for business development and job creation based on regional characteristics and local market needs that can contribute to the socio-economic inclusion of the SuTP to the LCH. The overall objective of the ENHANCER project is to improve employment and livelihood opportunities for SuTPs and LHCs in selected provinces with high concentrations of SuTPs. The ENHANCER project’s specific objectives are to:
Under the “Provision of External Evaluation Services of ENHANCER Project” contract, evaluation of the ENHANCER project accordingly with the OECD’s DAC (Development Assistance Committee) criteria will be conducted. The evaluation will be focused primarily on assessing progress towards the achievement of planned results using project indicators as well as assess the project design (activities/components, theory of change, assumptions, log frame) for their capacity to contribute to and achieve its planned results. The main aim of the evaluation is to provide the donor and ICMPD with sufficient information to:
|
BYS Grup will conduct an evaluation of project results and assess capacity of design to contribute to results. This can include, but is not limited to:
The evaluation proposal will include a clear approach to the evaluation, which is separate from the description of the methodology(ies) to be used (which will also be included). Besides, it is going to describe how the approach and methodology(ies) will be used to address the proposed evaluation questions, as well as to assess project progress and results and where planned, to test the project’s intervention logic. As the approach will incorporate a descriptive, summative outcomes-focused evaluation of project progress and results as well as an analysis of the strength of the theory of change, the evaluation is going to propose a mix of professional evaluation methodologies to address the evaluation questions and assess progress against project indicators. |